Project Name: project management
Table 1. Priorities with respect to Project Management
Inconsistency ratio: 0.13 (Inconsistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | Cost | 0.373 |
| 2 | Demand Forecast Accuracy | 0.234 |
| 4 | Lead Time | 0.105 |
| 3 | Storage Space | 0.115 |
| 5 | Supplier Reliability | 0.069 |
| 6 | Quality | 0.054 |
| 7 | Carrying Costs | 0.051 |
As shown in the table above, , According to the
Project Management ,
Cost
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
Demand Forecast Accuracy , Storage Space , Lead Time , Supplier Reliability , Quality and Carrying Costs according to the obtained weights.
Figure 1. Priorities with respect to Project Management
Table 2. Weights with respect to Carrying Costs
Inconsistency ratio: 0.082 (Consistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.402 |
| 2 | B | 0.321 |
| 3 | C | 0.183 |
| 4 | D | 0.094 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Carrying Costs ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.
Figure 2. Priorities with respect to Carrying Costs
Table 3. Weights with respect to Quality
Inconsistency ratio: 0.192 (Inconsistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.588 |
| 2 | B | 0.235 |
| 3 | C | 0.118 |
| 4 | D | 0.059 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Quality ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.
Figure 3. Priorities with respect to Quality
Table 4. Weights with respect to Supplier Reliability
Inconsistency ratio: 0.227 (Inconsistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.55 |
| 2 | B | 0.278 |
| 3 | C | 0.12 |
| 4 | D | 0.053 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Supplier Reliability ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.
Figure 4. Priorities with respect to Supplier Reliability
Table 5. Weights with respect to Storage Space
Inconsistency ratio: 0.119 (Inconsistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.427 |
| 2 | B | 0.306 |
| 3 | C | 0.179 |
| 4 | D | 0.087 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Storage Space ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.
Figure 5. Priorities with respect to Storage Space
Table 6. Weights with respect to Lead Time
Inconsistency ratio: 0.027 (Consistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.415 |
| 2 | B | 0.293 |
| 3 | C | 0.185 |
| 4 | D | 0.107 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Lead Time ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.
Figure 6. Priorities with respect to Lead Time
Table 7. Weights with respect to Demand Forecast Accuracy
Inconsistency ratio: 0.119 (Inconsistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.475 |
| 2 | B | 0.275 |
| 3 | C | 0.158 |
| 4 | D | 0.092 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Demand Forecast Accuracy ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.
Figure 7. Priorities with respect to Demand Forecast Accuracy
Table 8. Weights with respect to Cost
Inconsistency ratio: 0.281 (Inconsistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.555 |
| 2 | B | 0.244 |
| 3 | C | 0.126 |
| 4 | D | 0.074 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Cost ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.
Figure 8. Priorities with respect to Cost
Table 9. Weights with respect to Project Management
Inconsistency ratio: 0.149 (Inconsistent matrix)| Rank | Name | Weight |
| 1 | A | 0.494 |
| 2 | B | 0.274 |
| 3 | C | 0.15 |
| 4 | D | 0.083 |
As shown in the table above, According to the
Project Management ,
A
is the first priority. Next priorities are assigned to
B , C and D
according to the obtained weights.